Does education overhaul offer hope for court reform?

JB

Governor Jerry Brown

Since California voters gave the state increased revenues in November, court budget observers have watched eagerly for hints of how the new reality might play out, especially in the wake of already cutting hundreds of millions of dollars from the justice system.

Gov. Brown has been virtually silent on that front, but is signaling that some new proposals, which are expected to surface next week, will seek truly sweeping changes – at least for education. That has no doubt led many to speculate that similar big-picture approaches might be in store for the courts. Certainly some of the same issues are in play, especially the local-vs.-state decision-making powers.

Anthony York of the L.A. Times has a good New Year curtain-raiser story on the budget strategy,  saying the governor “… said he wants more of the state’s dollars to benefit low-income and non-English-speaking students, who typically are more expensive to educate.” [Read more…]

How. Low. Can. We. Go?

How. Low. Can. We. Go?

It’s no secret that California is cutting back, waaaay back, on its courts funding. This website is part of the reaction.

But a glimpse into the coming months of 2013 comes from a recent Wall Street Journal story.

“The number of locations handling small claims cases,” notes the WSJ, “will shrink from 26 to six, according to the court. Collections will be handled in just two places instead of 24. Under the courtroom reorganization plan, all personal injury cases will be concentrated at a single court downtown.”

Can you imagine? Malibu residents, long accustomed to local access, will have to haul themselves over to the Valley.

[Read more…]

Business Lobby Balks at California Auction of Carbon Emission Rights

By MARIA DINZEO

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (CN) – On the eve of the first auction for carbon-emission permits in California, the state’s Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit that slams the plan as a “money grab.”

By auctioning carbon allowances to entities responsible for the majority of the state’s pollution, the California Air Resources Board has created an unconstitutional tax, according to the complaint filed Tuesday in superior court.

“This action brought by an unelected state board to use regulatory statutes to raise tens of billions dollars from taxpayers is unprecedented in our state’s history,” the powerful business lobby claims. “Even the elected and democratically accountable Legislature and governors of California have never imposed such a massive tax/fee.

“What is shocking about this money grab, in addition to the fact it exceeds the authority granted to the regulatory agency by the Legislature, is the agency’s admission that this revenue-raising component of its regulations is unnecessary to achieve the purposes of the regulatory scheme.” [Read more…]